Sometimes, a writer just has to do her own thing
Saturday, Aug 4th, 2007 @ 08:34 pm
If I were to write the books my readers say they want me to write, I’d be frozen in a schizophrenic paralysis. Judging by recent emails, most of my readers are begging for another Rizzoli and Isles book, and they’re not so sure they want to read a stand-alone historical thriller like THE BONE GARDEN. Then I take a look at my reviews on Amazon.com and see some really rotten reviews from readers who write that they can’t stand Rizzoli and don’t ever want to see another book about her. No matter what I write, it seems that I’m going to piss off some reader somewhere.
I have to remind myself why I got into this business in the first place: because I love to tell stories.
Lately, I hunger to tell different kinds of stories. I came to that realization a few months ago, as I was preparing for my speech at Thrillerfest, about how to turn an idea into a book. As I was jotting down my thoughts, it occurred to me that what I’d tell writers today isn’t what I would have told them ten years ago. My sense of what makes a great story has changed because my reading tastes have changed. Many thrillers now leave me cold. I’ve grown tired of ever more cruel and gruesome killings. I don’t want to read about guns and explosions and invincible he-men or kick-ass warrior women. I don’t want to read about sociopathic, alcoholic heroes. And here’s the most surprising thing of all: action bores me. I find myself flipping past those scenes.
“What?” you’re probably asking. “How can a thriller writer be bored by action scenes?”
But it’s true. When I go to a movie these days, if there’s an obligatory car chase or gun battle, I find myself yawning and counting the minutes until some good dialogue comes along. I remember watching the second Matrix movie, and during all those painfully prolonged fight scenes between Mr. Smith and the Keanu Reeves character, I was bored out of my mind because — dare I say it?
Action is just not all that interesting. On the page or on the screen.
Maybe it’s the fact I’m getting older, but what I find riveting in a movie or a book is great dialogue infused with conflict. I find more tension in the witty repartee of a Jane Austen novel than in a James Bond chase scene. I find more suspense in the threat of violence rather than in the violence itself.
THE BONE GARDEN grew out of my own changing tastes. Lately I find myself drawn more and more to history, and I wanted to tell a meaty story set in a time of grave-robbers and horrifying medical practices. I wanted to write about Oliver Wendell Holmes and the dawn of microbial theory in medicine. The fact it isn’t a Rizzoli story may have touched off a bit of panic at my publisher. What? The author wants to try something new? Something her readers aren’t expecting? Something her readers may not want?
I wrote the book knowing full well that I will probably lose a few readers because the subject matter is so different. It’s a scary gamble, but I don’t want to be just another commercial ovelist who writes the same damn story again and again. That’s what readers, booksellers, and publishing beancounters want us to do. They want us to be predictable, because then they can predictably sell our books. They want us to conform to the brand we’ve established for ourselves.
They don’t want us to be artists; they want us to be trained poodles.
I’ve taken risky leaps more than a few times, so I know all about the possible rewards and consequences of doing the unexpected. Eons ago, I started off as a romance writer. Then I became a medical thriller writer. Then I wrote GRAVITY and became, briefly, a SF writer. Then I wrote THE SURGEON and became a crime writer. And now I’ve taken another turn with an historical thriller. Sometimes the gamble was a commercial success; sometimes (like GRAVITY) it was a commercial flop. But I’ve never once regretted having written a book. I’ve never said, “that was a baby I wish I’d never given birth to.” Because every book, whether it sold well or not, taught me something. Every book has been, in its own way, deeply satisfying. Every book was one I had to write.
Now I wait for THE BONE GARDEN’s release with more than a little trepidation. I’m proud of this baby, but I know how unforgiving the marketplace — and the critics – can be.
41 Responses to “Sometimes, a writer just has to do her own thing”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.

August 4th, 2007 @ 9:51 pm |
I am curious if you find that writing for a certain genre is easier for you than another. Or was your success in a particular genre affected by when it occurred in your career?
August 4th, 2007 @ 11:36 pm |
OK Tess,
Now you have me worried that I won’t like the book…but you know something, it won’t keep me from buying it…and the next one too. There is no law of the marketplace that says I have to like everything an author writes…and I’d be an idiot if I wrote your future works off based on our differing tastes at one time. There has been more than enough accumulated enjoyment of your work for me to stick with you for a while. And hey…it might be the best thing you have ever written!!
I don’t want to read the same story over and over again…that gets old, even if it does sell well. I think of another famous female author and forensic anthropologist (that is her field isn’t it?) - the books are very, very formulaic. The actual stories are different (and I always learns fascinating scientific stuff) - but the plot line is the same over and over…heroine called in to look at old bones unexpectedly gets involved in a current police murder investigation…ties disparate facts together that no one else sees, draws the attention of the murderer at the same time the police boyfriend and she are having issues and finally runs off on her own to check out something that leads to a face to face with the killer who either nearly kills her and she is rescued at the last minute by boyfriend - or nearly kills her but she kills him. A couple years ago I had to put off reading her newest for a while - until enough time had passed that the story seemed fresher again…
So Tess…you write what you want/need to write. Tell the stories that are in you trying to get out. I suspect that if you write to please yourself - there are a whole lot of us that will like the result!!
August 5th, 2007 @ 12:12 am |
Actually, that’s one of the reasons that I like your writing. And I liked Gravity but then I also like sci-fi.
I would much rather see you try something new than get to the point where the stories become formulaic. This is a problem with several big name medical thriller writers. I’ve abandoned more than one author who has chosen to stick to the same genre once they’ve run out of interesting stories to tell.
I look forward to an interesting read.
August 5th, 2007 @ 12:52 am |
Tess, first I have to say that I am getting sick and tired of sharing you with my significant other, John. I see your face on his night table, his desk, his bathroom sink, the kitchen counter and his pillow. I bought him one of your books and suddenly that’s all he reads. Seriously, girlfriend, you and your gorgeous author photos are all over my house!
Now that I have that out of my system, I have to say that I so understand needing to change what we write over time. I’ve been writing for more than twenty years! What interested me in the beginning doesn’t necessarily interest me now. . . and my values have changed. I’ve grown up a lot in twenty years, and that’s reflected in my writing. In my early writing days, I never understood readers who said they skipped over love scenes. Now I find I do too. . . unless they really are germane to character development.
I have ideas for all sorts of books percolating in my mind, and I hope I’ll have your guts to write them one of these days. It’s great you had publisher support to make this leap, and I look forward to reading THE BONE GARDEN. . . if I can pry it away from John.
August 5th, 2007 @ 3:24 am |
Hi Tess,

I have read most of your books and I have to say … whatever you go with when writing them, well, it always hooks me in. Whether it be up in space, to do with blood, or even slicing someone open, I have read every word of it. And to be honest I’m not fond of sci fi or anything like that, but the way you write has always made me want to take the time and read it. I can understand why you would be worried about how the book will go when its released, but I say stuff the lot of them that don’t like it, because there is going to alot of others that will enjoy it!!
August 5th, 2007 @ 9:24 am |
I sometimes fall asleep during car chases and long fight scenes at the movies.
The Bone Garden is more to my taste, so this is one reader who will be looking forward to it.
August 5th, 2007 @ 10:02 am |
Well, I must be truely weird, because I’ve liked all your books. Can’t think of one I ‘hated,’ they are all unique, even the Rizzoli and Isles ones, yes, the characters might be the same, but they are so different from each other.
Yes, I will buy “The Bone Garden” and will read it and like it, probably more than the others since I’m a archeology freak. One of the things on my list to do is find a fossil no one else has ever seen before…. LOL
August 5th, 2007 @ 10:32 am |
hi tess, i definitely miss jane and maura, but, i dont mind reading other works of yours. i read Harvest and i love it too! dont worry and let your inspiration flow. jane and maura can be back the next time
August 5th, 2007 @ 12:00 pm |
Hey Tess,
I really like the fact that you continually evolve and try new things. It actually gets a little grating when an author keeps churning out the same kind of story. We’ll just call you the Madonna of the publishing world! Evolving with the times, always staying fresh and current and keeping people on their toes. You didn’t get to where you are by playing it safe, did you?
As any creative person knows, if you get an idea that really latches on, then there’s no choice but to go after it. I have many different tastes as a writer (from literary, to fantasy, to suspense, etc.), and my ideas are just the same. I don’t like labeling people in general, and I especially don’t want a label as a writer.
So, you keep doing what you’re doing… We’ll read you no matter what! (Well, unless you decide to write a Star Trek novel, then I might have to pass!)
August 5th, 2007 @ 12:18 pm |
Well, I think the new book sounds great. There’s always such a struggle between the business of writing and the artistry of writing. It’s impossible to please everyone so you should aim to satisfy yourself Tess!
August 5th, 2007 @ 1:15 pm |
I read mainly crime fiction and one or two of my (other!) favourite authors have dipped their toes in other waters with, in my opinion only, mixed results. Michael Connelly has had great success with his Harry Bosch series but when he ‘went courtroom’ with THE LINCOLN LAWYER I thought it was in every way up to par with anything he had produced before, if not better, and indeed it may spawn a new series in its own right. Meanwhile John Connolly hit the ground running with his Charlie ‘Bird’ Parker series, writing five (almost) consecutively before trying other things including an odd but likeable foray into the world of adult fantasy tales. But when he returned to ‘Bird’ very recently, I personally felt he had lost some of the edge, the identity perhaps, of the characters that made him such a successful author. My point is that a book should always be judged on its own merits and not be interpreted by way of precedent or expectation. Just because it’s completely different does not mean that it should be compared with the familiarity of established characters that give fans their comfort factor, but equally, whether it’s number nine in a series or a standalone, it should be judged on its own and given a rating based on that one novel alone. I would imagine that it takes a lot of courage to deliberately miss out on what might be considered a dead-cert big seller and instead produce something radically different, but if that’s the subject or direction that arouses the greater passion in the writer then, chances are, the reader will soon know that after 100 pages or so and realise that it’s quality that matters above all else and not an obligation to fulfill a sense of duty by producing the latest episode in what could be in danger of being classified as soap.
Having said that, regardless of how I react to THE BONE GARDEN, I’m still looking eagerly forward to a juicy return for Rizzoli!
August 5th, 2007 @ 4:06 pm |
Tess,
I have got to agree with you on the action stuff. I cannot stand action or any kind of Fantasy. And you mentioned being predictable. I love that in an author. Also, I would love to see more Rizzoli books, I don’t think that I would love you as much if I didn’t have those books. My teachers are the same way. I was letting my Home Ec. teacher read the series and when she found out she had read them all, she was about to cry. We are patiently awaiting her return. Also, Maura needs to make up her mind, does she or does she not want the preacher. I wanted her to like the one dude, I can’t remember his name, but you blew his head off. I’m sure you will get that settled some day. Also, if you stuck to the same thing, we wouldn’t have your medical or crime novels. You would still be writing romance. So, Tess, change whenever you want to. I will always buy your books. Your style is very unique and that itself keeps me reading. But, I have to say THE MEPHISTO CLUB was is my least favorite. It had more Fantasy in it and that’s why. I’m not saying I didn’t like it, just I wasn’t as thrilled as the others.
I hope THE BONE GARDEN does do good for you. The title is a catcher anyway. The time period of the book is a very high interest in my eyes. I’m not that big on historical, but that era, you have me in the bag. I’m buying it the day it comes out. It is on my calendar!
August 5th, 2007 @ 4:44 pm |
Tess, I could not admire nor respect your position more than I do. The business side of an author’s career is important–of course it is. But so is author satisfaction, which comes from energized creativity, which comes from caring about the story first and foremost.
For your sake and mine, I’m glad to know that you continue to have Ballantine’s support even when you shift course a bit. And I’m quite eager to read THE BONE GARDEN!
August 5th, 2007 @ 5:23 pm |
Im going to take a different angle on this. (Watch it you nearly got Angel. LOL) First of all youre never going to please everyone. So why try? A book has to be not only engaging but the author has to develop a special bond with the character. If they dont it doenst matter how well written the book it, how good the plot is, there will always be signals that the author hates the character.
Why write something different? Well it allows the author to tackle different things, gives them something to get really psyched up about every day, they can’t wait to get back to their writing medium, it shows, plus if the author is engaged so too is the reader.
If the author always worried about what the fans wanted next they’d never write another book again. THe point is, people became the fan because of what was written before, they found it engaging. So what if the new book is different, it still will contain the things that the fans loved, the writing style, a great tale and of course present them with something that will keep the glued to the end.
Now what IM about to say may come as a shock but I read between 24 and 30 books a month. Yep that many and there has been times when I can spot an author who hasnt put everything that fans have come to expect behind a book sending it out half cocked just to have the thing done. Im getting pretty darn good at spotting them. So when I do it always makes me question the authors next book. Are they going to improve, are they listening to critiques, are they relying on thier name to sell?
Authors that tend to do that just recycle plots after all if its not broke why fix it? An author who isnt afraid to explore additional angles or to tackle something a little different from what theyre known for should be applauded, it shows a willingness to tackle different things, it shows a commitment to push thier writing further and it shows that theyre not prepared to let thier fans down who have spent thier hard earned cash on them.
Whilst a number wont enjoy it, there will be others who will and will also let others know and bring new readers to the genre. That sort of commitment is always a good thing. Listen to fans by all means but the head and heart have to agree on what the writer wants to create. Have great fun writing Tess, but dont worry about will they or wont they like it. If you enjoy it, we’ll enjoy it, if its something that the author wants to read then its going to go down well with the fans. That and your husbands comments should help you.
August 5th, 2007 @ 5:36 pm |
Tess, look at it this way. By the time the next Jane Rizzoli book comes out I will have forgotten everything in The Mephisto Club and have to re-read it. That should increase sales of that book. I’m not mentioning names here but there are at least two authors with HUGE reputations that have gone to the same well once too often. I seriously doubt that I’ll buy anymore of their titles. Their books have become product.
We have a local author in the OKC area who started a mystery series and now her publisher won’t let her continue it. Her two Oklahoma mysteries are fabulous and she hasn’t been able to get back to them for several years now. The publisher wants “general fiction”–whatever that means.
Tess, the returns are now coming in. I’m pleased to announce that the Oklahoma County Library System has pre-ordered 68 copies of The Bone Garden. The order for big print copies is pending and the compact discs aren’t mentioned yet. I believe that this is roughly the same number as for The Mephisto Club. You’re on solid ground here.
Although I’m a rock solid Jayhawker, I’m pleased to announce that my current home state, Oklahoma, is celebrating it’s centennial this year on November 16. We are the 46th state.
August 5th, 2007 @ 8:21 pm |
Tess, you write well regardless of the storyline. I will continue to read your books until you stop writing them. As others have said, write the stories you want to write. When your heart and passion are engaged in the story, I can’t imagine it being anything but riveting.
August 6th, 2007 @ 12:12 am |
tess-didn’t you forget one small detail in your blog entry?you left a medical career at a relatively young age to pursue writing-that was a huge crapshoot-especially considering all the years it takes to become a practicing physician-so changing genres should be a small step by comparison-i find that when a series of books by any crime/mystery/thriller writer developes an interior chronology that interferes with the enjoyment of the books if read out of order it might be time to retire that line(but i guess it didn’t hurt harry potter)-the late george higgins wrote crime novels-they weren’t thrillers by any stretch-that were almost wholly dialogue-driven-the action was sparsely described-even when a movie was made of his first novel it was very short on violence-and only one tiny car chase in a parking lot(didn’t last long)-but it was very long on character interaction and the use of dialogue was every bit as important as in the book-great casting and location shooting didn’t hurt either.prince of the city was another crime book/film duo that eschewed violent action or much action of any kind at all-it was based on an actual series of events so it was nearly a documentary-the book itself was non-fiction-the most recent action film i saw was so over the top it almost put me to sleep-i must tell you tess that the thought of jane austen after having been forced to read pride and prejudice and then have to play mr.darcy in a skit in high school is enough to make me heave:)
joe
August 6th, 2007 @ 1:26 am |
I remember this time last year when you wrote a similar blog in trepidation about your realeasing the Mephisto Club which you thought was also quite different because of its subject matter. What with the religious zealots bashing it and all. So what I think is that my behind will be at my nearest bookstore on release day buying your book because, wait a minute…oh yeah, YOU CAN WRITE! It doesn’t matter if it’s not a book (God help us, like the Prey novels, like the freakin’ Ever-Ready bunny, keep going and going and going…) that we’ve grown accustom to as readers, your most loyal fans will buy your novels because you’ve established that with us. We know you can write and while I’ll admit I was a mite disappointed that the new novel isn’t a Rizzoli/Isles but you know what, I was also thinking what one of your novels would be like if you decided to write a different one for once, without your “used to” characters. So basically, even if I hate your new book (which is highly unlikely but humor me) I will still buy your novels because I like how you write and I think you’re fantastic. So there, you will at least have one book sale Dr. G.
August 6th, 2007 @ 9:07 am |
You’ve mentioned before that GRAVITY didn’t sell as well as you hoped. Boggles my mind. I love that one.
August 6th, 2007 @ 10:24 am |
Bravo! Just do what you need to do. If you don’t grow, we your readers will anyway, and perhaps we’ll stop reading Gerritsen’s or we won’t. That part is all a gamble. Remember the story of the Man, the boy and the donkey. If you listen to what everyone says to you, soon you will be carrying the donkey.
August 6th, 2007 @ 2:07 pm |
Tess: I agree with you on the action-scenes-are-boring theory. Pulp Fiction is a good example. It had plenty of action, but the dialogue totally stole the show. Whenever I put an action scene in my books, I always keep it to 1-2 pages. What leads up to it is always way more interesting than the actual event. Best, Jim.
August 6th, 2007 @ 4:06 pm |
I know this isn’t the topic, but I feel the same about sex in novels. It just should not be described in any detail at all!! Especially by male writers, who, in my experience, are hopeless at it! (That’s writing about it, not doing it) The events leading up to it: Yes. But that’s where the chapter should end! Sex, and in a similar way, violence, are best left to the imagination - it can be so much more moving/erotic/disturbing.
August 6th, 2007 @ 8:55 pm |
The Bone Garden sounds incredible. I’m counting the days till September 18th…
As for the gratuitous violence/non-stop action, I agree. I finally got around to watching The Departed this week. My family predicted I would hate it, but they couldn’t have been more wrong. The dialogue, the plot twists, a pitch perfect setting, and three incredible acting performances were made the story powerful and unforgettable. In the end, that’s what it’s all about.
August 7th, 2007 @ 12:48 am |
I wish more historical crime novels would be written and published because I really enjoy reading them. (or maybe I’m not looking hard enough?)
And I think that if an author is not passionate about their story, it shows through in the writing and the reader will probably become disinterested too.
August 7th, 2007 @ 1:51 am |
Tess,
I have to be honest with you on this. . . There are so many readers with different factors and perspective into your writing collection. My entrance into your world started with a five buck and an excitement into the mountain of bargin books until I found GRAVITY. Since I fell in love with that book, what took me beyond GRAVITY was your style of your own writing I find assuming and interesting to me. It is like a never-ending addiction.
Now, I continue to follow you and your books with a strong and open mind. There are some books you have written that I wasn’t so comfortable, but I kept on reading and learned alot from it. This allowed me the opportunity to become a better person than I was. I would be proud to be still following and supporting you all the way.
Also, you seems to be one of the few authoer out on the internet who would be willing to spend your time express your random thoughts on every life through your blog. I have taken that into consideration and find it extremely useful.
Maybe its my loyalty to you. . .
Flow your writing as your body and mind mends together.
-Josh Simpson
August 7th, 2007 @ 10:09 am |
Tess
I am a new reader of yours. My Sister-in-law owns every single book you have written and over the past few years she would always be reading one and I never got into them. Never tried, not sure why but I was looking for something new to read and went to the library and picked up Vanish - not realizing that it was part of a series. But I finished it within a week or two and then picked up The Surgeon, and couldn’t put it down. Tomorrow I am starting The Apprentice and I am telling everyone about your books. I honestly don’t think it will matter what you write, people will love any book you write. Just keep them coming…
August 7th, 2007 @ 4:07 pm |
Hi Tess,
You once popped into the Borders store I work in on my day off. If I can forgive you for that I can forgive you for making me wait a while for Maura and Jane’s next book.
History books and historical fiction are hot at the minute so your passion and enthusiasm should ensure a terrific novel.
You could do what Clint Eastwood did with Warner Bros and do one project that they wanted him to do and then one project that he really wanted to do.
Good luck, you are such a brilliant author.
Paul
August 8th, 2007 @ 8:40 am |
Hi Tess -
I believe, absolutely, that we are at least half a dozen different people during our lifetime. We step into new personas as our life experiences mold us over time.
Like you, my tastes have changed drastically, especially in music. Back in the day, when I was beginning my studies at a conservatory, all I wanted to play was Chopin. My teacher had to ram contemporary composers down my throat and I hated learning them, practicing them and I never performed any of those pieces in public.
Now, I can’t get enough of late twentieth century composers and, although I still adore Chopin, his compositions, at times, seem overly simplistic in structure.
What happened? The process of living life, raising children, sharing my life with their father is what happened. I can’t really relate to that dewy-eyed twenty-something gazing with wonder at her first newborn. That phase of my life has been tenderly placed in some cosmic closet for safe keeping, rarely taken out.
Why? Because that’s where it belongs.
August 8th, 2007 @ 10:10 am |
I’m so bummed every time I read on here that “Gravity” was a commercial flop. I *loved* that book. It is what made me want to read more of your writing. And reading the back flap copy for “The Bone Garden” has me very, very interested.
I do enjoy your Isles/Rizzoli books, don’t get me wrong, but I love to see you stretch yourself and do something new. I like to be surprised by new and interesting situations. And “The Bone Garden” hits all the right notes for me. Now, I just need to get out there and buy it.
By the way, I would love it if you went back to sci-fi! I think you did a GREAT job of giving the reader a behind-the-scenes look at real astronauts and what really goes on up in outer space. Guess that won’t be happening any time soon, huh?
August 8th, 2007 @ 1:05 pm |
I don’t read a lot of historicals, but I love the way you tell a story and for that reason alone, I’d buy anything you wrote. Ditto for my mom. My mom isn’t into supernatural anything, and THE MEPHISTO CLUB wasn’t her favorite, BUT she still enjoyed it and is very much looking forward to THE BONE GARDEN. Because you are a great storyteller, period.
I’m still new in my career and still very happy to write the dark romantic suspense stories that I started with, but I also have other ideas that might be a little different and I’ll admit, it makes me nervous to start thinking about them because they ARE appealing to me and I don’t want to hate what I’m writing now.
I think the greatest fear is whether I can pull off something different. But the next fear is that if I lose interest in what I’m writing now, it will show in the final product. I’ve seen too many authors who I can pinpoint the book where they lost the love.
Anyway, you are a storyteller first and I’ve never read a Tess Gerritsen book I didn’t love.
August 8th, 2007 @ 8:40 pm |
Tess - I read almost every book you have published! I love the thrillers…every book you put out I can’t put down. I hope to enjoy the new one just as much! Just keep up the good work, I will always love your stories!
August 9th, 2007 @ 10:23 am |
Tess - I LOVE all of your books. I started reading with “Body Double”, and loved Maura and Rizzoli so much that I back-tracked to read the rest of the series. I have also continued with that series, and do dearly enjoy every bit of Jane and Maura that you share with us.
Having said that, I also went and read your “older” books, like Gravity (which I LOVED too, by the way. Found it very sad, and heart breaking, but a great thrill), and Bloodstream.
Although I would have loved to see another Rizzoli book, I am equally happy and excited about the Bone Garden. I like new things, and since I love your writing style, I am sure I will enjoy this one as well!
Like you’ve said, you love to write because you enjoy telling stories … we are your readers, and we will read whatever you choose to write, so … KEEP IT COMING!
August 10th, 2007 @ 11:17 pm |
Tess,
I can’t wait to read this book, it sounds really interesting. I must admit I was looking foward to another Jane and Maura novel. I did notice on the backflap that Maura is mentioned, is she only making a special “brief” appearance in this novel? Well, can’t wait I have the date marked on my calender.
~ A ~
August 11th, 2007 @ 3:22 pm |
i love the jane rizzoli and maura isles series.
it’s very medical, which i enjoy, and has the requisite elements of suspense. but it isn’t all action and no thought, and the characters emote from a very different depth.
i especially love maura isles, and in some ways she’s a lot like me - how she relies on science, how she’s not given to appearances and her introspect most of all. and i find that most of the time, i really understand where she’s coming from.
i’ve read some of your reviews on amazon, too, and i think the reason why most people are evidently disappointed in your newer releases is because they want action-packed hardcore thrillers, while the deeper content actually can’t get into them.
don’t go by the bandwagon! write more of your wonderful medical thrillers. most people i know who read your books read that series anyway.
August 12th, 2007 @ 4:30 pm |
Tess, the Oklahoma County Library System has ordered 17 copies of The Bone Garden in the Big Print edition. No news yet on the audio.
August 12th, 2007 @ 5:12 pm |
Tess, when I find a writer whose work I enjoy, I’ll follow her anywhere.
Just the title alone made me want to read THE BONE GARDEN. Now that I know a bit of what it’s about, I can’t wait until it’s released.
August 13th, 2007 @ 7:04 am |
Hi Tess!
I love your Jane/Maura novels. Please don’t stop writing the series.
But I will definitely look forward to your future novels be it the series or not. I like your writing style!
August 13th, 2007 @ 7:29 am |
I enjoy the character differences between Rizzoli and Isles but have also read your standalones. A lot of long series get a bit samey after awhile so I’m always happy when authors I read progress.
You’re books are on auto-buy for me anyway I’ve not been disapointed yet. Reading this blurb just makes me want the book now!
August 14th, 2007 @ 3:54 pm |
Hello Tess,
Just read that bit about you learning something new from every book you have written and just realised I’d not read “Gravity”.
You mentioned it had not been a commercial success and dipping for a little while into the realms of Sci-Fi. I guess you learned a lot from that! However, if I do come across it I’ll give it a whirl!
Still new realms ahead with new novel in September.
Best wishes.
y
August 14th, 2007 @ 4:05 pm |
Just wanted to agree with Clare about series of novels becoming “samey”.
Something to beware of, I’d say. Seen that happen to two of our top Scottish writers. After a while I just didn’t want to read any more of them. Stand alones are the way to go, perhaps with the occasional one of the series in between, giving you more time to create new characters.
August 25th, 2007 @ 10:15 pm |
Sometimes writing is much like the planning of a wedding or a funeral. In all three cases and after the fact, I have not been able to please all - in attendance, invited or not.
I am akin though removed to your romance roots. I sat through the anguish of many grade X courses working feverishly (looking as do the cover couples) on my attempt at a romance novella instead of the prescribed curriculum. I am sure Harlequin laughed themselves crying with my submission and age obvious impression as did the pedagogy.
I am safely woven into the “aspiring author” area rug.
In looking at gifted people and creativity - the ability to switch domains and reach a peak level in a different area, to pioneer as it were….. in academia at least, this to me, seems easier to do then it is to maintain this level and keep plugging away in one domain. And some of the smartest, most creative researchers, simply switch domains whether due to stagnancy or stipend.
I like how my own writing is evolving and my appreciation shifting. As a reader however, I am most comfortable filtering the genre apart from the prose or a sentence which catches my breath.
I have only recently discovered your writing. I have read and in no particular order 1) Harvest 2) Life Support 3) The Surgeon 4)Bloodstream and I look forward to seeking out those copies of your romance pages for which you have no control over in re-releasage as well as what is coming to life. This neither frightens nor dissuades me but comprises a body of work I am interested in exploring. I was pleasantly surprised to find comparison or description in your “thriller” style book which held me in different terms. This, I did not anticipate but instead felt sure I would find the adrenaline gear ratios of the “car chase” or the “there is noise in the basement therefore the lone/hand some woman must investigate” scenes….
I am sure your romance foundation has given rise and relationship and practice to beauty in what you describe - anywhere.
I have trouble sorting our my own versatility of ideas as applied to a “genre” without losing the overview, or adding to the conceptual dearth. And because I am moving toward quality and I prefer to look at things in their own existence, I probably wouldn’t make a great reviewing entity!
My daughter read(s) young and well. She quickly gave up the “Magic Treehouse” series for the less dependable formula and proof testing of richer recipes, too.
I struggle with predicting with certainty what will be welcome in my writing and of course, I’ve yet to publish. To me the process I can only imagine as like….
“The truly creative mind in any field is no more than this:
A human creature born abnormally, inhumanly sensitive.
To him… a touch is a blow,
a sound is a noise,
a misfortune is a tragedy,
a joy is an ecstasy,
a friend is a lover,
a lover is a god,
and failure is death.
Add to this cruelly delicate organism the overpowering necessity to create, create, create - - - so that without the creating of music or poetry or books or buildings or something of meaning, his very breath is cut off from him. He must create, must pour out creation. By some strange, unknown, inward urgency he is not really alive unless he is creating.” -Pearl S. Buck
I once lamented to my sister ” I’m not sure how to write for anyone but myself”.
Her response….. “Sometimes, this makes the best writers”.
~ Idle Open Descent, 36