Monday, Aug 13th, 2007 @ 03:24 pm
I’ve been out of town the past week, and came home to find many great comments on my recent blogposts. Some of the best blog topics came straight from my readers, and here’s one I thought deserved a blog unto itself. The reader asked: “Is there an advantage to writing for a romance publisher like Harlequin? Is that a way to launch a career?”
I’m sure that reader noticed (as has anyone else who’s paying attention) that a large number of big-name writers who appear regularly on the New York Times bestseller list are former romance authors. Nora Roberts, Tami Hoag, Lisa Gardner, Jayne Ann Krentz, Sandra Brown … my gosh, the list could go on and on. These ladies (and I’m one of them) all started off writing category romance books. In case you don’t know what I mean by “category romance,” I’m referring to the paperback books that are released once a month from such publishers as Harlequin, Silhouette, or Bantam. All the books in a particular line (for example, Harlequin Intrigue, which is the line I once wrote for) have similar covers and are on the stands for only that month, then they get replaced by the next month’s offerings. In the way they’re marketed and sold, they’re similar to monthly magazines. But yes, they really are books. And yes, many a now-famous novelist was once a romance author.
But it doesn’t mean that category romance is a good place for a novelist to “break in.” First, “breaking in”, whatever the genre, isn’t as easy as you’d think. I once heard a Harlequin editor say that in a single year, her office received about a thousand unsolicited manuscripts — out of which they accepted two of them. So if you thought you could blithely pound out a 300-page boy-meets-girl story, send it off to Harlequin, and sit back and wait for your royalty checks to arrive, you’ve got a rude awakening in store. Selling a romance novel isn’t easy. If you have no respect at all for the genre, trust me, the editor is going to sniff that out and all you’ll get back in the mail is a rejection letter.
But let’s suppose you do respect the genre and you have the chops to write a publishable book. Category romance does offer a few advantages as a place to start one’s career. First, your audience is already built in. Those readers who like the Harlequin Intrigue line will often buy from the line every single month, including books by authors they’ve never heard of. You’ll have good distribution throughout the U.S., in grocery stores and bookstores. You’ll probably have international distribution as well, with translations of your book showing up in countries around the world. If you write consistently and quickly, you’ll soon develop loyal readers who will buy your books no matter which company publishes you. You’ll also have the chance to develop and grow as both a writer and as a business person. You’ll learn the ropes of dealing with agents and editors, you’ll gain experience in the industry, and yes, you’ll even make a little money.
Ah, that money issue. Here’s where category romance publishing presents a problem. There’s a glass ceiling when it comes to income, because your books, no matter how brilliant, are marketed and distributed exactly the same way as every other category author in your line. The great book isn’t pushed any harder than the mediocre book, and if you have aspirations of hitting bestseller lists, you’ll get frustrated when your print run always stays the same, even though your last books were fabulous. So your per-book income will pretty much stay the same within the line. When I was writing for Harlequin Intrigue, my highest advance was $10,000. I’d have to write a lot of books a year to send a kid to college. To be perfectly honest, romance isn’t that different from other genres. Whether you write paperback mysteries, westerns, or science fiction, an advance of $10,000 isn’t unusual, and sometimes it’s much less. So if you want big contracts, if you want to hit bestseller lists, you have to break out of category.
Another downside to writing category romance isn’t monetary, but emotional: you’ll have to suffer the slings and arrows of literary snobs who will never consider you a “real” writer. Yeah, I know we’re supposed to take pride in our work and forget the critics, but let’s be honest, it hurts to get asked when you’re going to write a “real” book. (And yes, I heard that comment more than once. In fact, I still hear it!)
If and when you move into a different genre — say, thrillers — that “ex-romance author” label will stick to you like Superglue. You’ll never get rid of it, and unfairly or not, it will affect how critics review you, and how “serious” readers regard you. Which is why you’ll find that many former romance authors may get huffy and refuse to talk about their old romance novels. They’ve been burned, that’s why. They want to be regarded as writers, period, and not hear snide comments and sarcasm.
14 Responses to “unabashed about romance”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.


August 13th, 2007 @ 6:16 pm |
Hey Tess,
I am one of your biggest fans, but I’m sad to say, I have never read any of your romances. That’s because I havn’t seen them in the bookstores, now I know why. I’m also not a big fan of romances. I’m reading ANGELS FALL by Nora Roberts right now and there are parts where I am gagging she is so descriptive when it comes to the “ending part”. When I get ready for publication, I hope that it won’t be AS hard. I’m Reading Advisor for 2 authors, one known globaly, and at the age of 15, already a writer for my local newspaper. So, I’m hoping with the experience it won’t be as hard, but that all depends on if the publisher likes the book or not. Lisa Scottoline gave me a great tip of advice. She said something along the lines of, “Don’t think ‘this is the best book, it has to be published. Don’t stop writting, write it and send it out.” So, I am keeping that in mind. Looking forward to the bookmarks!
Dustin
August 13th, 2007 @ 6:44 pm |
Hi Tess - Harlequin, Silhouette, Bantam and such like seem to focus on the genre of romance. Is there an equivalent ‘brand’ that specialises in crime fiction, mysteries and thrillers?
Oh and by the way, you’re a REAL writer in my book: 24-carat, High Definition and totally digital (o:
August 13th, 2007 @ 10:16 pm |
Are not females better Romance writers than males? Who wants to read a romance written my some man? Homosexuals maybe.
I think a hot subject to write about is family members fighting - physically and spiritually. I don’t like fights, but they seem to be common in today’s family.
August 13th, 2007 @ 11:15 pm |
Let me Entertain You,
Why can’t a male write a romance. Today’s stereotype of man no, but today’s unstereotyped male can. For example, Nicholas Sparks is a great romance novelist. Just because I am a male, does that mean that I can’t write a good romance novel? Absolutely not, I can write a romance as good as a female can. Make a relationship where your heart glees with passion for the love or lust the characters share for each other, toss in some near break-ups in there and make the reader think the relationship ends there and your screaming at the book, “No, No!”. I do think that more males should write romances. It would be nice to have the males prospective of the relationship, ‘Does she like me, should I ask her out, what if she doesn’t like me?’ I’m sure it’s not as easy as I am making it sound to write a romance novel, but you got my point. Males can write a good romance novel.
Dustin
August 14th, 2007 @ 8:28 am |
As a matter of fact, there are a few men who write romance novels — but do it under female pseudonyms. So yes, men can write great romances, but they have to start off having respect for the genre.
August 14th, 2007 @ 8:58 am |
Just about everything Dr. Gerritsen said about romance also applies to shared-world fantasy–media tie-in novels set in worlds such as Star Wars and Star Trek, and those created for role-playing games such as Dungeon & Dragons and White Wolf.
One of the advantages is the built-in readership, some of whom will buy every title in a particular line. Some lines (although most decidedly NOT Star Wars) are open to new writers, so it’s a place to break in. But there’s a great deal of competition, and breaking in isn’t easy. Books stay on the shelves longer than category romance, but strong sales don’t always lead to additional printings. I’ve had books that sold out very quickly and even made national and chain bestseller lists, but the publisher, content with the high sell-through, moved on to the next title. It’s usually to the publisher’s advantage to concentrate on the line, not the individual authors. And these days, there are dozens of media tie-in settings that include movies, TV shows, video games, table top miniature games, and role-playing games. The pie that represents a fairly small niche audience has been sliced into teeny pieces. So there is definitely a glass ceiling on shared-world writing; to break out, a writer needs to work on creator-owned stories.
There’s definitely a stigma to shared-world writing. Many fantasy readers avoid it, having decided that it is by definition inferior to other fantasy. Even “mainstream fantasy” writers (a term not unlike “jumbo shrimp”) deride this sort of writing and the people who do it. Many print and online reviewers have well-aired biases against shared-world fiction. Even in positive reviews–even when they’re reviewing a writer’s creator-owned work–they can’t seem to avoid commenting on their views of shared-world fiction in general.
So why bother? Because no matter what you write, there will be people who don’t care for that sort of work in general or yours in particular. So if you like romance novels and have the knack for writing them, write romance novels. If you love Star Wars or the Forgotten Realms and have the opportunity to contribute to a setting you enjoy, go for it.
Forgive me if this seems off topic, but it occurred to me that the points made in this post are probably applicable to many types of writing. I suspect that just about every field has people, readers and writers alike, who sniff at something different from what they want to read or write. And then there’s literary vs. commercial, mainstream vs. genre, genre vs. genre, genre vs. subgenre. The point is, if you start letting it bother you too much, you’ll never get ANYTHING written.
August 14th, 2007 @ 9:08 am |
Tess, this couldn’t have come at a more providential time. My first mystery, THE BLACK WIDOW AGENCY, is due out in October from Midnight Ink Books, followed by another in July and so on. Believe me, I’m thrilled and grateful and the books are receiving lots of attention, but I think all writers fear being caste into one genre so tightly that they’ll never be able to break out. It’s that “Don’t judge me by one genre, I’m a REAL writer” syndrome.
Jodi Picoult and I had an interesting e-mail exchange about this not too long ago. In her own words, she is unique to have “created the genre of no genre.” Few authors can make that claim. It is refreshing to read about other authors having broken out of genres. I’ve never written a romance, but I think anyone who has the tenacity to sit down and write 300 pages and tell a good story deserves respect.
Felicia Donovan
Author, THE BLACK WIDOW AGENCY series
http://www.feliciadonovan.com
http://www.blackwidowagency.com
August 14th, 2007 @ 2:37 pm |
Thanks for blogging about this. As usual I learned something. I hadn’t thought about the ceiling placed on earnings from a series like that (among other things).
I don’t usually read Harlequin books or shared world books like Star Trek because the format/restrictions imposed by the imprint limit the variety of stories too much for my taste. I will, however, read certain authors–either ones that I’ve found through other means or ones who are allowed to flout some of the rules that other authors are bound by.
I read ‘Call After Midnight’ and ‘Under the Knife’ this summer, and I just picked up ‘Double Impact’ which has ‘Never Say Die’ in it. I was curious to see how well you wrote before you were a “bestseller.” Pretty good (darn it). I find it interesting to see how your writing has changed over time, although more times than not I forget to look at that and just read.
I appreciate that you don’t just tell a different story with each book (a feat all its own), but that you also refine your craft.
August 15th, 2007 @ 1:42 am |
Tess is right. You have to love and respect your genre to ever make a go of it. Editors can spot phonies a mile away. Write what you love, love what you write. Persistence is key, and good old fashioned luck never hurts, but you absolutely must be in love with the story you’re telling. If not, then why bother?
August 15th, 2007 @ 5:34 am |
Hi
What a fantastic blog! Its good to be open- minded and go beyond first impressions before you form an opinion.
You get more enjoyment if you are willing to try books from category romance and sci-fi tie-ins.
One thing that does need improving in the romance category is avoiding titles such as ‘In the Greek Billionaire’s bed’. Billionaire?! I think girls expectations are getting way out of hand. Surely having a nice car should be good enough.
Paul
August 16th, 2007 @ 11:19 am |
You say there are a few men who write romances under pseudonyms; why do you think that is? Robert James Waller, Nicholas Sparks, and James Patterson have found great success with their romantic fiction, so why are there no men writing category romances and paperback originals under their own names?
August 17th, 2007 @ 12:08 am |
Jodi Picoult’s a fine writer but she didn’t invent the “no genre” genre. There are thousands of writers who write what she writes and have been writing it for time immemmorial. Its called fiction. The history of “genres” is the newer history.
August 18th, 2007 @ 6:12 am |
‘Category romance does offer a few advantages as a place to start one’s career.’
This is one of the many reasons why I am targetting my writing at Category Romance. Yes, it makes sense to write what you love to read, and I do read these books. But it also makes a lot of business sense for exactly the reasons you list.
Stand alone books are hard to sell to agents/publishers/audience if the readers do not know your name. To me, Category romance publishers like Harlequin offer new writers an amazing and unique opportunity to build a career and a readership who deserve respect from the critics and authors alike.
I would be proud to create a Category Romance story that someone takes pleasure in, and is willing to hand over their hard earned cash to buy. In this world of multi-media entertainment options, for someone to choose to read your words and pay for the priveledge is a precious thing.
Anyone who makes snide and arrogant comments re the superiority of one genre or type of book vs Cat Romance is clearly an idiot [ waving current publication statistics may help] and, worse, a waste of time and emotional energy which is better spent on creating fiction people of all genders might actually want to read.
As for titles? Ah, the joys of marketing.
Must go now, bestselling Category Romance to finish.
Take care all, Ray-Anne.
August 18th, 2007 @ 1:51 pm |
jheaton,
re: why aren’t men writing category romance under their own names?
Partly, it’s what publishers have always believed: that women readers trust only women writers to deliver a romance novel. Waller and Sparks don’t necessarily write what could be classified as romance novels, since their books often end up as tearjerkers, and categorical romances are upbeat stories, with happy endings.
I’d be interested to see how the sales would compare if a man’s name appeared on a category romance cover.